Switchback Travel | Best Hiking Shoes of 2024 (2024)

The momentum in hiking footwear is moving away from bulky boots toward lightweight shoes and even trail runners that are faster and more comfortable. You do lose some ankle support when carrying a heavy pack or traversing rocky trails, but the weight savings and feathery feel are worth it for many. Below are our favorite hiking shoes of 2024, from ultralight options for fast and light trips to more supportive models for carrying a full pack. For more background information, see our hiking shoe comparison table and buying advice below the picks. And if you prefer an over-the-ankle style, see our article on the best hiking boots.

Our Team's Hiking Shoe Picks

• Best Overall Hiking Shoe: Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX
• Best Budget Hiking Shoe: Merrell Moab 3
• Best Ultralight and Cushioned Hiking Shoe: Hoka Speedgoat 5
• Best Shoe for Backpacking and Technical Trails: La Sportiva Spire GTX
• Best Hiking Shoe for Off-Trail Scrambling: La Sportiva TX4
• A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet: Altra Lone Peak 7

Best Overall Hiking Shoe

1. Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX ($160)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 11.5 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Great balance of weight and on-trail performance.
What we don’t: Love-it-or-hate-it fit and comfort.

Salomon’s X Ultra has been one of our favorite hiking shoes for years, offering an exceptional combination of comfort, on-trail performance, and durability for everything from casual day hikes to ambitious overnight missions. Last year, they released an update to the much-loved shoe in the X Ultra 4 here. Beyond its sleeker and more modern look, the X Ultra 4 features a revised lacing system and chassis, along with a roomier fit in the toe box. Importantly, the shoe retains the outgoing version’s fantastic mix of agility, support, durability, and protection, and there’s enough cushioning underfoot for full days with a loaded pack. Finally, at 1 pound 9 ounces for our men’s size 9, it’s competitively lightweight and nimble.

While the latest X Ultra 4 takes our top spot, it wasn’t a near-universal choice as in years past. In short, some of our editors weren’t huge fans of the 4’s fit, which features a narrow midfoot, spacious forefoot, and hard-to-customize quick-pull lacing system. For some, this offers a locked-down feel but perhaps too roomy of a toe box; for others, it’s ideal in the forefoot but too tight at the arch. What’s more, the raised collar around the front of the ankle can be a source of rubbing and discomfort for some users (in this case, it wasn’t a problem for our testers). All that said, if you can try it on before you purchase (and it fits), the latest X Ultra is undeniably a high-performance, quality option... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX See the Women's Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX

Best Budget Hiking Shoe

2. Merrell Moab 3 ($120)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 2 lb. 1 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: Great value for a very comfortable and well-built hiking shoe.
What we don’t: Not built for technical terrain.

These may not be your long-distance or fast-and-light hiking shoes, but there is a lot to like about Merrell’s flagship Moab 3. What has made this shoe so popular over the years? Most notably, it's the lightweight but planted feel, comfortable and well-padded fit, excellent durability, and attractive price point. Merrell updated the Moab over a year ago, including recycled materials, a new insole, and modest updates to cushioning and traction, but the formula largely remains the same. For day hikers sticking to established trails, the Moab 3 is comfy and a great value.

In terms of downsides, on rocky and muddy trails, we’ve found that the Moab’s traction and stability fall short of a performance shoe like Salomon's X Ultra above or the La Sportiva Spire below. And at 2 pounds 1 ounce for a pair, it feels a little slow and cumbersome compared with some lighter and nimbler alternatives (including the X Ultra 4). But these are reasonable tradeoffs for casual hikers, and it’s hard to deny the price, which checks in a full $40 less than the top-rated Salomon. Keep in mind that we included the non-waterproof version here, but Merrell also makes a waterproof model that costs $140 and weighs slightly more at 2 pounds 2 ounces per pair... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Merrell Moab 3 See the Women's Merrell Moab 3

Best Ultralight and Cushioned Hiking Shoe

3. Hoka Speedgoat 5 ($155)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 4.6 oz.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Plush cushioning offers all-day comfort; grippy outsole.
What we don’t: New uppers lack structure; not as durable as a dedicated hiking shoe.

Hoka used to be a niche brand for runners, but that has changed dramatically over the past few years and the brand is now a go-to option for hikers. This trajectory makes sense: More and more people are ditching their burly boots for hiking shoes and trail runners—if you stay mostly on established trails and aren’t scrambling or carrying a heavy pack, a lightweight trail runner can offer the best combination of performance and comfort. And with thick yet supportive cushioning, an impressively grippy sole, and a long track record of success, the Hoka Speedgoat 5 is our favorite shoe in this category.

What are the shortcomings of the Hoka Speedgoat 5? We have been surprised by how quickly they wear down—the sole and midsole in particular. When standing at our local running store recently, a gentleman in front of us was buying new Hokas and said, “I absolutely love these shoes but am bummed by how quickly they pack out,” which sums up our experiences as well. In addition, the revamped upper now forgoes any overlays, which means you get less protection and stability than previous models—we found the 5 quite squirrely for trail running on technical terrain. But for those who hike or run mostly on established trails, you simply won’t find a more comfortable shoe for the job.
See the Men's Hoka Speedgoat 5 See the Women's Hoka Speedgoat 5

Best Shoe for Backpacking and Technical Trails

4. La Sportiva Spire GTX ($209)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 15 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex Surround)
What we like: A backpacking-ready shoe that is tough, comfortable, and well-made.
What we don’t: Super pricey and a bit heavy.

Many of the designs on our list are lightweight or almost trail runner-like in nature, but La Sportiva’s burly Spire is backpacking-ready—or just about as close as a hiking shoe gets. It feels sturdy and substantial with good stiffness and a thick midsole, effectively isolating you from rough and rocky trails (La Sportiva even goes so far as calling it a low-cut hiking boot). Throw in excellent protection and grip over a variety of terrain, plus a quality build that we’ve come to expect from this Italian climbing brand, and you have one of the more capable hiking shoes on the market.

Why isn’t the La Sportiva Spire ranked higher? At nearly 2 pounds, it’s heavy for a low-top hiking shoe and sits relatively high on the ankle. Second, the $209 price tag makes it the most expensive model on this list, and notably more expensive than many hiking boots. Finally, we appreciate the accommodating fit that should work well for most foot types, but the shoe is a little wide at the heel and we had to cinch it down tightly to avoid slippage. These issues aside, it’s hard to knock the performance chops or build quality of the La Sportiva, and it offers a nice step up in on-trail performance and durability compared to the TX4 below... Read in-depth review
See the Men's La Sportiva Spire See the Women's La Sportiva Spire

Best Hiking Shoe for Off-Trail Scrambling

5. La Sportiva TX4 ($159)

Category: Approach shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 10 oz.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Approach shoe grip with hiking shoe comfort and weight.
What we don’t: Leather upper limits breathability in hot weather.

The La Sportiva TX4 certainly isn’t a traditional pick, but boy do we love this shoe. It’s built as an approach shoe, which means that it’s grippy and tough for long hikes to climbing objectives or traveling over steep, rocky terrain. The Vibram outsole, full rubber rand, and smooth area of sticky rubber under the toe make it a great option for scrambling, smearing, and edging on rock. But what we have been impressed with most is its versatility: The TX4 does equally well moving fast on the trail with its light and moderately flexible construction. We even like it for everyday use due to the high levels of comfort and attractive design.

As with most approach shoes, the La Sportiva TX4 does have limitations. The dotty tread grips exceptionally well on wet and dry rock and even impressed us with traction on snow, but it will fall short of a true hiking shoe in dirt and mud. Further, some hikers—mostly those of the fast-and-light variety—might find that the stiffer sole feels clunky and inflexible. But overall, don’t be dissuaded by the approach shoe label: The TX4 is a worthy companion for long days on the trail. And keep in mind that La Sportiva does make this shoe in a number of versions, from the uber-lightweight TX2 EVO up to the all-new TX Hike Mid (a full-on hiking boot)... Read in-depth review
See the Men's La Sportiva TX4 See the Women's La Sportiva TX4

A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet

6. Altra Lone Peak 7 ($150)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 6 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: A thru-hiker favorite thanks to its low weight and comfort-first design features.
What we don’t: Roomy fit and flexible design aren’t ideal for difficult terrain.

Similar to the Speedgoat above, Altra’s Lone Peak was designed first as a running shoe and has since become a thru-hiker favorite. But while we love the Speedgoat for its agility and cushioning, the Lone Peak is highlighted for a different skill set: The shoe has a roomy toe box, features a zero-drop shape that encourages a natural stride, and offers great ground feel, with just 25 millimeters of stack height compared to the Speedgoat’s 33 millimeters (at the heel). It all adds up to a very comfortable shoe that’s especially ideal for long-distance hikers with wide or hard-to-please feet. Altra also tacks on a few trail-worthy features, including a rock plate and gaiter attachments; and the recently updated 7th generation improves the design with a simplified, seamless upper and moderately more aggressive outsole.

We commonly recommend the Lone Peak to hikers who have struck out with other hiking footwear (most often due to issues with blisters and pressure points caused by overly stiff or narrow designs), and have yet to lead anyone astray. But the shoe isn’t for everyone: It’s much too wide for most narrow feet, and the zero-drop design can feel particularly squirrely on uneven terrain. And compared to a svelte shoe like the Speedgoat, the Altra offers a more sluggish, “padding along” kind of experience—in fact, we have a hard time not using the word “slipper” to describe the Lone Peak. But for long-distance hikers who prioritize roominess and comfort above all else (this is especially key once your feet start to swell), the Lone Peak is hard to beat.
See the Men's Altra Lone Peak 7 See the Women's Altra Lone Peak 7

Best of the Rest

7. Danner Trail 2650 ($170)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 8 oz.
Waterproof: No (GTX available)
What we like: Comfortable, grippy, and looks good for use around town.
What we don’t: Pricey and can’t match the X Ultra above in stability.

Danner is best known for their work boots, but the longtime footwear brand has made a nice transition to hikers of late. The Trail 2650—it’s named after the length of the Pacific Crest Trail—has a lot going for it: It’s comfortable right out of the box, grippy with a Vibram outsole, and impressively light at 1 pound 8 ounces per pair. And this shoe manages do what most hiking shoes don’t: look good in the process. All in all, we’re impressed with the direction that Danner is headed, and the Trail 2650 is one of the more versatile options on this list.

Despite its lightweight build, the Danner offers a step up in protection compared to the trail runners above and below, with generous heel and toe protection and a fairly stiff rubber sole. On the other hand, it’s far from the most stable design here—with a low collar and less of a locked-down feel than shoes like the La Sportiva Spire or Salomon X Ultra 4, it will show its weakness on tricky terrain or while hauling a heavy load. What’s more, we’re not quite sure what to make of the rather massive piece of rubber on the heel, which seems to go above and beyond the necessary levels of protection. But these are small complaints about an otherwise comfortable, capable, and modern lightweight hiking shoe... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Danner Trail 2650 See the Women's Danner Trail 2650

8. The North Face Vectiv Exploris 2 Futurelight ($169)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 10.8 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Futurelight)
What we like: Generous cushion, hardwearing materials, and impressively grippy outsole.
What we don’t: Not as stable as a traditional hiking shoe, especially on off-camber terrain.

The North Face’s footwear lineup has seen a lot of modernization in recent years, and the Exploris 2 is case in point. Taking inspiration from their Vectiv trail running collection, this hiking-specific variation features a rockered profile for moving fast on the trail, a full-length TPU plate in the midsole for stability, and a lightweight yet durable synthetic ripstop upper. TNF utilized their in-house Futurelight waterproofing, and the thin construction helps minimize overheating when working hard in mild temperatures. Finally, the updated “2” boosts comfort with 2 millimeters of extra cushion and a more accommodating toe box. The styling may be a little polarizing—it’s not as around town-friendly as alternatives like the Danner Trail 2650 above—but it’s clear that a lot of thought and effort went into the design.

We took the Vectiv Exploris 2 backpacking in Patagonia and returned with mostly positive impressions. The SurfaceCTRL rubber was impressively confidence-inspiring on everything from slippery rock to mud, and there was little to no break-in period. Further, the waterproof membrane held up extremely well despite the sloppy conditions and numerous creek crossings. And while the rockered shape did feel a little awkward at first, it really came to life and gave the shoe a natural and poppy feel when hiking quickly. We wouldn’t push the Exploris 2 too hard into cross-country terrain—it felt slightly tippy while crossing talus and boulder hopping—and despite the updated toe box, we found the shoe to be on the narrow side. But for a durable yet nimble hiking shoe that will feel just as comfortable on mile 20 as it does at mile 2, the Exploris 2 is well worth a look.
See the Men's TNF Vectiv Exploris 2 See the Women's TNF Vectiv Exploris 2

9. Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 14.6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: Cushy design is extremely comfortable; smooth ride.
What we don’t: Some outsole durability issues and polarizing looks; fit runs big.

The Hoka Speedgoat above has achieved legendary status among hikers (specifically the thru-hiking community), but there are some notable trade-offs with the trail-running design. For those who want a bit more support and protection, Hoka also offers an impressive lineup of hiking-specific footwear, including the Anacapa 2 Low here. The Anacapa (also available in a mid-height version) features Hoka’s well-known springy midsole, a rockered shape for a smooth ride on the trail, and a beefed-up construction that includes durable nubuck leather and a Gore-Tex waterproof liner. The result is a fast-moving shoe that nicely mixes a trail runner-like feel with the added structure of a hiker.

The Anacapa was recently updated to the “2” with a focus on more sustainable materials, along with a few noteworthy changes to the midsole and upper. With a less intrusive heel counter, additional tongue padding, and a slightly softer midsole, the 2 is arguably more comfortable than the outgoing version, and Hoka also enhanced the toe box for more durability and protection. However, we were surprised to see that the Vibram Megagrip outsole remains virtually unchanged—like the original, it features large sections of blown rubber that are susceptible to damage from rocky trail use. Additionally, we found it fit slightly larger than the outgoing model (some may need to go down a half size). But the Anacapa 2 nevertheless is a solid update to a very good hiking shoe, and it’s especially ideal for those who stick to established trails and prioritize cushy comfort. For a more breathable design for summer hiking, check out the non-waterproof Anacapa Breeze Low ($155).
See the Men's Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX See the Women's Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX

10. Adidas Terrex Swift R3 GTX ($160)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 11.9 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: Hiking boot-like protection, stability, and toughness in a streamlined build.
What we don’t: Stiff and less comfortable for moving fast.

With a light but sturdy and supportive build, Adidas’ Terrex Swift R has consistently been a trail favorite. The third generation brought a more traditional lacing system—which we consider a positive as the quick-lace design on the R2 was finicky—but otherwise, they stuck to the winning formula. Its outsole grips well on everything from mud to rock, and the moderately stiff construction makes it a nice pairing for more technical terrain and when carrying an overnight or multi-day load. Finally, we appreciate the tough and long-lasting materials used throughout: There’s no open mesh in the upper like you’ll find on less durable trail runners, and protection is great around the toes and sides of the feet. For hikers wanting a boot-like feel in a low-top shoe, the Swift R3 is a worthy option.

Some of the Swift’s closest competitors include the La Sportiva Spire and Salomon X Ultra above. All the designs balance weight, cushioning, and trail performance well, although the Salomon is the lightest and nimblest of the bunch. For those who like a little more structure and stiffness, the Adidas and La Sportiva have their appeals, but the tradeoff is a longer break-in period and a somewhat clunky feel when you’re trying to move quickly. We also found the R3 runs a little big, which led to a fair amount of heel slippage on extended climbs (some may need to size down). These complaints push the Swift R3 down our rankings, but if it fits you well, the shoe offers a nice combination of durability, support, and price... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Adidas Terrex Swift R3 GTX See the Women's Terrex Swift R3 GTX

11. Brooks Cascadia 17 ($140)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 6 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A classic thru-hiking shoe that offers more stability than the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above.
What we don’t: Heavier than the Speedgoat and less durable than a traditional hiking shoe.

Now in its 17th generation, the Brooks Cascadia is one of the longest-standing trail runners on the market and particularly popular in the thru-hiking community. Like the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above, this shoe bridges the gap for speed-focused hikers with the support and protection you need for rugged trails alongside a hefty dose of cushioning for long days out. And at only 1 pound 6 ounces for the pair (our men’s size 9 was a hair more at 1 lb. 6.5 oz.), it won’t weigh you down as much as the hiking-specific shoes here. We took the recently updated “17” on a backpacking trip through Washington’s Necklace Valley and were impressed with its balanced design: The Cascadia felt stable and precise while traversing off-camber terrain with a full pack but remained impressively quick and responsive when running the vehicle shuttle at the end of the trek.

How does the Cascadia compare with another darling of the thru-hiking world, the Altra Lone Peak? Both offer a nice array of trail-ready features like aggressive rubber outsoles and attachment points for gaiters, but the Brooks is the technically capable option with more cushioning and protection underfoot and better stability. In terms of fit, the two shoes feature roomy toe boxes that are great for accommodating swollen toes (the Altra is more spacious), but the Cascadia locks things down more at the midfoot and heel for a more performance-oriented fit. A final key difference is the Cascadia’s 8-millimeter drop compared to the Lone Peak's zero-drop shape, which lends a more agile and quick overall feel (although the “natural” zero-drop profile of the Altra is one of the reasons it has such a loyal following). In the end, we think the Brooks is the better all-rounder for most hikers, although the Altra gets the edge for those with particularly hard-to-please feet.
See the Men's Brooks Cascadia 17 See the Women's Brooks Cascadia 17

12. Merrell Moab Speed Low ($130)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 6.6 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: Well rounded on-trail performance in a lightweight build.
What we don’t: Step down in durability and support from a traditional hiker.

Merrell is a long-time leader in hiking footwear, and their Moab Speed Low brings the much-loved Moab (above) into the modern era. The Speed Low features a lightweight and cushioned design that will appeal to day hikers and weight-conscious backpackers alike. And despite its trail-runner-esque appearance, the Merrell still offers a healthy amount of protection and support—including a generous toe and heel cap and firm midsole—along with a capable Vibram outsole. The end result is a hardwearing yet easy-to-wear hiking shoe that toes the line between weight-savings and on-trail performance better than most—and the price is right too at just $130.

The Moab Speed Low will get the job done for the majority of day hikers and ultralight backpackers, but keep in mind that it’s far from the most supportive or durable shoe here. If you’re headed out on technical terrain or with a heavy pack, models like the La Sportiva Spire and Salomon X Ultra 4 will offer noticeably more underfoot stability and isolation from the trail. On the other end of the spectrum, the Speed Low feels decidedly firmer and more planted than the even lighter Speedgoat above, although you don’t get the Hoka’s snug and sock-like feel (we noticed a bit of movement at the heel with the Merrells). In the end, the Speed Low hits a real sweet spot in the hiking market, and we think is a great option for Merrell loyalists that want a fast and light setup... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Merrell Moab Speed Low See the Women's Merrell Moab Speed Low

13. La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II ($165)

Category: Trail runner/hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 9 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Incredibly capable in mountain terrain, including top-notch protection and grip.
What we don’t: Relatively stiff and clunky; mesh upper retains water.

La Sportiva bills their Ultra Raptor as a mountain running shoe, but we’re big fans of this design for hikers venturing above treeline on rugged trails or cross-country terrain. Now in its second iteration, the Ultra Raptor II provides chart-topping protection against rocks and roots by way of generous toe and heel caps and a full-length rock plate, along with incredible grip on everything from mud and loose talus to boulders and snow. Ample cushion makes the shoe comfortable enough to wear all day, and a sock-like construction keeps the foot snug while sealing out trail debris. For high routes, climbing approaches, and peak bagging, the Ultra Raptor gives Sportiva’s Spire and TX4 shoes above a run for their money in terms of protection, support, and durability.

But for all the Ultra Raptor’s strengths, it’s not our shoe of choice for most trails. Compared to most trail runner-inspired designs, the Sportiva is rather stiff and clunky, and the rigid TPU heel counter is known to cause discomfort in the heel for some. Second, although the Ultra Raptor is built with a mesh upper, it has a tendency to absorb rather than drain water, which makes for a heavy shoe after creek or snow crossings. But the Ultra Raptor is an incredibly capable shoe for technical mountain terrain, and the fun updated colorways—particularly for women—certainly don’t hurt. La Sportiva also makes the Ultra Raptor II Leather GTX, which is just a few ounces heavier, offers waterproof protection, and retails for $179... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Ultra Raptor II See the Women's Ultra Raptor II

14. Scarpa Rush 2 GTX ($199)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 10.8 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (Gore-Tex)
What we like: Trail runner-like agility with a boost in protection and stability.
What we don’t: Expensive; not as light as trail runners like the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above.

The hiking-shoe-meets-trail-runner love story has been unfolding for a number of years, and Scarpa’s freshly updated Rush 2 GTX is a prime example. With the cushion and rocker of a trail runner alongside the stability and protection of a hiking shoe, the Rush is a best-of-both-worlds option for modern hikers. Specifically, you get a durable fabric upper with welded reinforcements, burly midsole with EVA foam and TPU reinforcements for cushion and stability, and a sticky, rockered outsole that facilitates quick movements. All told, if you’re considering a trail runner but are wary of giving up the support and hardwearing nature of a hiking shoe, the Rush 2 GTX (also offered in a mid-height version) is well worth a look.

We wore the first-gen Scarpa Rush while trekking in southern Patagonia and were impressed with its prowess on everything from hardpacked trail to talus and smooth rock. Our main gripe was the shoe’s low collar and poor ankle lock; thankfully, the 2 offers a noteworthy improvement with increased stability and torsion control at the rear. And while the Rush is significantly heavier than trail runners like the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above (read: not ideal for running), it does feel lighter than its weight would suggest (and in a side-by-side test, the first-gen version was notably more cushioned than the top-ranked X Ultra 4). Finally, the Scarpa is pricey at $199. But for speed-focused hikers and fastpackers, it’s hard to knock the purpose-built design, which offers a nice boost in stability and protection compared to standard trail running shoes.
See the Men's Scarpa Rush 2 GTX See the Women's Scarpa Rush 2 GTX

15. Salomon OUTpulse Low ($125)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 7 oz.
Waterproof: No (GTX available)
What we like: Lightweight, agile, and grippy, with great crossover appeal.
What we don’t: Soft and flexible; thin upper.

Salomon recently added the lightweight OUTpulse GTX boot and shoe to their ever-expanding hiking footwear line. With a hiking-shoe-meets-trail-runner build, the OUTpulse Low has appeal for everything from long day hikes to shorter trail runs. It’s slightly lighter than the X Ultra 4 GTX above at 1 pound 7 ounces, and forgoes some of the X Ultra’s stability and cushion with a softer and more streamlined midsole. On the other hand, it’s a step up in support and traction from trail runners like the Hoka Speedgoat or Altra Lone Peak above. All told, the OUTpulse will be the best of both worlds for many hikers, and especially those sticking primarily to established trails.

But while the OUTpulse Low will get the job done for carrying a light pack on well-trodden trails, we don’t recommend it for particularly technical terrain or overnight loads. Comfort will start to suffer if the shoe is pushed too far, resulting in tired feet and sore ankles. What’s more, the thin, knit-like upper won’t hold up to heavy use, and—if you're considering the waterproof version—we question the efficacy of pairing a waterproof membrane with such a low-profile design (water can easily get in at the ankle). But we’re big fans of the OUTpulse for moving quickly on smooth terrain, and with a low weight and modern looks, it has great crossover appeal as well.
See the Men's Salomon OUTpulse Low See the Women's Salomon OUTpulse Low

16. Adidas Terrex AX4 ($100)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 10.2 oz.
Waterproof: No (GTX available)
What we like: Grippy and tough at a fantastic price.
What we don’t: Limited toe protection and cheap insole.

We didn’t anticipate two Adidas Terrex shoes making our 2024 list, but the AX4 impressed as a well-rounded budget offering. At just $100 for the non-waterproof version—$20 less than the Moab above—you get excellent traction from the Continental-brand outsole, a durable upper, and a simple but effective lacing system. On lengthy and challenging hikes in southern Patagonia, we found the shoe surprisingly adept: Its light weight and low-profile midsole make it easy to trust when scrambling, and there’s sufficient cushioning to isolate you from rocks and roots. As a day hiking option, the Terrex AX4 has a lot going for it.

Unsurprisingly, there are a few compromises in the AX4’s affordable build. First and foremost is the lack of a proper toe cap, which we got a few painful reminders of when catching rocks on the trail. Additionally, the insole is cheap, thin, and seems to hold stink more than a higher-end OrthoLite design. Finally, while comfort is quite good considering the price, spending up for a shoe like the Merrell Moab Speed above will get you a softer interior and springier cushioning. In the end, high-mileage users may want to steer clear, but the AX4’s combination of price and performance earns it a spot for this year... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Adidas Terrex AX4 See the Women's Adidas Terrex AX4

17. Arc’teryx Aerios GTX ($180)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 8 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Light, tough, and extremely well built.
What we don’t: Pricey, unisex fit, and short lugs give up a little traction on wet and soft terrain.

Arc’teryx has built a reputation around premium and sleek-looking designs, and their Aerios GTX carries the torch. Now in its second iteration, this shoe is one of the Canadian brand’s biggest success stories of late, combining the comfort and light weight of a trail runner with the protection and stability of a hiking shoe. It’s very light and nimble at just 1 pound 8 ounces per pair, waterproof with a Gore-Tex membrane, and tough with a burly toe cap and a large swath of TPU where the upper meets the outsole. What’s more, the current iteration features a 100% recycled polyester upper, which has proven itself to be just as durable as the outgoing model’s Cordura. For these reasons, it’s our favorite shoe inArc’teryx hiking footwear lineup to date.

In terms of traction, the Aerios is in its element on rock thanks to a sticky Megagrip Vibram outsole, but the shorter lugs compromise grip over wet and soft terrain like mud and snow. Additionally, we have some hesitations about the unisex sizing: Unlike the mid-height Aerios FL 2, which includes men’s and women’s variations, the single sizing option here can make it a little difficult to nail the fit (specifically the width). But if it fits you well—it’s best for those with average to narrow feet—the Aerios GTX is a premium piece of footwear for everything from speedy day missions to week-long treks in the mountains. And for a more breathable option for hot summer hiking, Arc’teryx also makes the non-waterproof Aerios Aura ($150), which features a mesh upper.
See the Arc'teryx Aerios GTX

18. Keen Targhee Low Vent ($145)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 13.6 oz.
Waterproof: No (waterproof available)
What we like: Cushioned and comfortable; above-average build quality.
What we don’t: Pricier than the Merrell Moab above without enough to show for it.

Like Merrell's Moab, the Targhee is Keen's signature everyday hiker. Updated a few years ago, the changes weren't groundbreaking but did a nice job at modernizing the classic design. Most importantly, the super-wide foot bed of the previous model has been trimmed down slightly to give the shoe a slightly less sloppy feel over rocky terrain (it’s still plenty roomy for most folks, though). The Targhee Low Vent still won’t be confused with an aggressive model like the Salomon X Ultra 4 above—in looks as well as performance—but its tough leather construction, reasonable weight, and well-cushioned interior make it a great casual hiking shoe.

Among day hiking options, the Keen Targhee Low and Merrell Moab 3 are two of the most popular on the market. Both are very comfortable right out of the box, offer sufficient support and traction for non-technical trails, and can even do the trick on shorter backpacking trips. The Targhee’s Nubuck leather upper is a little more durable than the Moab’s mesh-heavy build, but the Keen isn’t as good of a value at $145 (the waterproof version is $145 as well). That price difference is enough to push it slightly down our list, but the Targhee’s standout comfort make it a consistent favorite.
See the Men's Keen Targhee Low See the Women's Keen Targhee Low

19. Oboz Sawtooth X Low ($135)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 15.6 oz.
Waterproof: No (BDry available)
What we like: A modern update to a much-loved classic.
What we don’t: Pricier and less breathable than the Moab 3 above.

Based in Bozeman, Montana, Oboz has a reputation for making tough, comfort-first footwear for less than much of the competition. The Sawtooth has long been one of their most popular models for both day hiking and overnights, and this year it received a full overhaul with the latest “X.” Responding to the resounding movement toward lighter and nimbler footwear, the Sawtooth X features a modernized aesthetic and refined fit, along with added Cordura for abrasion resistance. But the original formula remains largely the same, including a roomy toe box and plush interior, Oboz’s supportive O Fit insole, and a tough, durable construction that can handle mile after mile of trail abuse.

What’s not to like about the Sawtooth X? Despite Oboz’s efforts toward streamlining the design, it’s still a fairly heavy shoe and less agile than most. And with a leather upper and plush cushioning, its breathability suffers compared to the lighter, mesh-heavy hikers above. In looking at the Sawtooth X and Moab 3 side-by-side, the Merrell is $15 less and better ventilated, while the Oboz is a bit lighter (by about a half-ounce per shoe) and offers more durability by way of Cordura in the upper. It’s also hard to find fault with the Sawtooth X’s fit, which is built to accommodate medium-to-high-volume feet and has a very minimal break-in period. We have yet to test the newest version of the Oboz, but are intrigued by the design and will update this review as soon as we do. And lastly, the Sawtooth X also comes in a low-top waterproof model ($160) and waterproof and non-waterproof versions of a mid-height boot.
See the Men's Oboz Sawtooth X Low See the Women's Oboz Sawtooth X Low

Hiking Shoe Comparison Table

Hiking Shoe Buying Advice

• Hiking Footwear Categories
• Weight
• Stability and Support
• Waterproofing
• Breathability
• Lacing Systems
• Hiking Shoe "Upper" Materials
• Midsoles and Cushioning
• Outsoles and Traction
• Toe Protection
• Insoles
• Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots​
  

Hiking Footwear Categories​

Hiking Shoes
For the vast majority of day hikers, and even a good number of backpackers and thru hikers, a hiking shoe that falls just below the ankle is the perfect match. Shoes like our top-rated Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX are stiffer and more substantial than a trail runner for carrying a light load over mixed terrain but don't feel draggingly heavy like a full-on boot. Furthermore, hiking shoes often have a tougher construction than trail runners, with increased use of leather and durable nylons as opposed to mesh. Protection from obstacles like rocks and roots come courtesy of rubber toe caps and medium-stiff midsoles. Hiking shoes also are great options for folks needing a substantial shoe for daily wear, just be aware that the outsoles will wear faster on pavement.

Trail Running Shoes
If moving fast trumps all else, you should consider a trail runner. Shoes like the Altra Lone Peak and Hoka Speedgoat have gained significant popularity over the past few years for being the ultimate lightweight option and are a common sight on thru hikes like the PCT and AT. That said, keep in mind that these types of shoes are not traditional off-trail or backpacking footwear. Trail runners are flexible and super comfortable, but they don’t provide much in the way of ankle support when you’re carrying a heavy load and generally have minimal toe and underfoot protection. For hikes on established trails or for experienced minimalist trekkers, however, a trail runner remains an excellent option. We’ve included a couple great hybrid trail running and hiking options in this article, but for a complete breakdown, see our article on the best trail running shoes.

Approach Shoes
The third option has a relatively narrow focus: climbers or hikers that need a grippy shoe to tackle steep rocky terrain. Many rock climbers will use an approach shoe on the hike in (hence, the “approach” name), and swap out to a true climbing shoe when the going gets vertical. Approach shoes are easy to spot: They have a large rubber toe rand and a sticky, low-profile rubber compound underfoot for maximum grip on rock. The shoes can be plenty comfortable on day hikes, especially a crossover style like the La Sportiva TX4, but aren’t what we typically recommend as a daily driver. The treads aren’t as secure on muddy hiking trails and they’re not as comfortable underfoot for long trail days. If, however, your day hikes include a lot of scrambling or low grade rock climbing, an approach shoe is an excellent choice.

Weight

Arguably, the most important change in modern hiking shoe technology is the movement to lightweight designs. Tough but thin fabrics and a shift from over-the-ankle boots to low-top shoes have made putting on major miles a lot easier. It’s no surprise most thru-hikers now choose a hiking shoe over a traditional leather boot. Most of the shoes on our list weigh 2 pounds or less for a pair—by comparison, a backpacking boot like the Asolo TPS 520 tips the scales at nearly 4 pounds. And on your feet, the weight is even more apparent. True, the drop in ounces sometimes impacts long-term durability, but there are still a number of compelling hiking boots for traditionalists and those needing the extra support. For most, a lightweight shoe is a much better partner for day hikes, peak bagging and minimalist overnighters. And as long as the rest of your gear is equally light, there are very few sacrifices.

Stability and Support

As a reflection of the push for lighter gear in all facets, hiking shoes are moving away from the traditional stiff construction of a hiking boot in favor of flexibility and a nimble feel. All hiking footwear (excluding some minimalist trail runners) does retain a degree of stiffness thanks to built-in shanks or internal supports. These features are part of what separate a hiking shoe (and approach shoe) from a super flexy cross trainer or road-running shoe.

For day hikes on flatter or less technical terrain, we can’t recommend a lightweight and semi-flexible hiking shoe enough. Shoes like the Merrell Moab 3 and Keen Targhee Low are standouts for these uses. As your trips get longer and your pack gets heavier, a more substantial shoe still wins out for us. Look to the Salomon X Ultra 4, Adidas Terrex Swift R3, and La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II for great all-around options that are equally adept at conquering summit peaks and multi-day backpacking.

Waterproofing

Once you narrow your hiking footwear search, you may be considering the GTX question: Do you need waterproofing or not? In theory, waterproofing is a nice security blanket if you’ll be hiking in the mountains. The extra protection that comes with a waterproof and breathable membrane inserted into the shoe is great for creek crossings, surprise rainfall or if you hit snow on an early season trek. But the extra layer adds weight, impacts breathability pretty significantly (discussed below), and the designs aren’t always perfect. We’ve found Gore-Tex models to work consistently well, and many in-house designs perform similarly keeping water out (breathability is a different story), including the Oboz Sawtooth's BDry technology.

Whether or not you need waterproofing often comes down to a personal choice. Are you a summer-only hiker or live in a warm and dry area? We’d recommend a non-waterproof shoe in most cases, and some of the best ventilating shoes are the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II and Merrell Moab 3. But if you get into the alpine regions or would benefit from the added protection and modest insulation waterproofing provides, we’d lean the other way. The great news is that most shoes on our list are offered in both varieties. Expect to pay about $20 to $30 more for the addition of waterproofing.

Breathability

The truth about waterproof liners, even expensive Gore-Tex booties, is that they don’t breathe well—just as a waterproof jacket won’t be as breathable as a comparable non-waterproof version. Simply put, waterproof and breathable membranes restrict a shoe’s ability to pull moisture away from your sweaty feet as efficiently as a non-waterproof upper. Not all non-waterproof shoes should be treated equally, however. Footwear that features thinner fabrics and a lot of mesh will increase moisture transfer and airflow, which will keep feet less sweaty in hot weather as well as dry out soggy hiking socks far more quickly.

Gore-Tex Surround, which is designed to bring 360 degrees of breathability by venting out the insole of the shoe, is an intriguing, if expensive, concept. It’s been well received in a few models, including the La Sportiva Spire, but performance will always fall short of a shoe made mostly of mesh (for more, see our in-depth Spire review). No matter your final decision, we encourage you to at least give non-waterproof footwear a thought before selecting your next pair of hiking shoes.

Lacing Systems

Easily overlooked, laces, as well as the lacing system of hooks and eyelets, play an essential role in fit and comfort. If a shoe has a poor lacing system that is prone to loosening, you’ll find yourself having to readjust constantly on the trail. If the system itself doesn’t secure your heel very well, the up and down walking motion will create hot spots and blisters. If the culprit is just the laces themselves, it’s an easy fix: There are a number of good quality replacement laces available. But if the system design doesn’t hold your foot very well, we recommend looking elsewhere.

Some models, including the Salomon X Ultra 4, have a single-pull lacing system. The design is totally convenient and we’ve had no more issues with durability than a traditional lace. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that you aren’t able to adjust the fit between eyelets, so the fit will be equally tight across the entire foot. Those with finicky feet that need to fine tune their laces to be comfortable may be best served avoiding quick lace designs.

Hiking Shoe "Upper" Materials

Nubuck Leather
Made of full grain leather, but given a brushed finish that has a suede-like feel, Nubuck leather is a common sight on heavier duty hiking shoes. The softer touch leather is lighter and more flexible than traditional, glossy full-leather options, and is more durable than most nylons. It does fall short in breathability, however. As a result, it’s common to find a mix of leather and nylon mesh for abrasion resistance and breathability, including the Merrell Moab and Keen Targhee Vent.

Midsoles and Cushioning

TPU
Thermoplastic polyurethane, (mercifully) shortened to TPU, is a durable plastic commonly found in performance-oriented light hikers. Shoes that use TPU underfoot are often less cushy than those with only EVA but will last longer and better handle a heavier load. In addition, they’ll keep their shape longer and won’t be prone to compressing like EVA. Because both midsole types have valid applications and TPU is more expensive, it’s common for a manufacturer to use a TPU frame or shank for stability and toughness and add in EVA underfoot to increase comfort.

Outsoles and Traction

One of the main reasons to upgrade from a flimsy cross trainer to a true hiking shoe is for improved traction. In a way that more casual footwear can never match, hiking and trail running footwear is leaps and bounds better when the going gets rocky, slippery, and steep. And much in the same way that Gore-Tex dominates the market for mid to high-end waterproofing, Vibram inhabits a similar space for outsoles. Their name is synonymous with solid grip and traction in a variety of terrain. Not all Vibram models should be treated as equals, however, as the rubber manufacturer tailors their designs for the specific footwear and brand. Some have much larger lugs underfoot for serious grip in mud, and others prioritize sticky rubber for scrambling over rocks. There are also more entry-level options that just do well on easier trails, like the lugs you’ll find on the bottom of the Merrell Moab 3 boots and shoes.

Salomon is one brand that doesn’t outsource their traction needs. Instead, they use their in-house Contagrip compound for all of their hiking and trail running models. We’ve found the level of quality and performance is in-line with the Vibram offerings across the board, from anything from their fast-and-light X Ultra 4 hiking shoes to the burly Salomon Quest 4 backpacking boots.

Toe Protection

Hiking trails, even well maintained ones, are full of rocks, roots and other potential hazards, so we almost always recommend a hiking shoe with some type of toe cap. Lacking any protection on the front of your shoes can lead to a trip ruining impact when you inevitably look up from the trail to enjoy the scenery. Hiking shoes typically have a full rubber toe cap, but trail runners sometimes have a trimmed down version or none at all—one of the compromises in opting for a minimalist shoe. Approach shoes, on the other hand, have exceptional toe protection with their wraparound rubber rand at the front of the shoe.

Insoles

Just like with running shoes, the stock insoles that come with nearly every hiking shoe generally are cheap. For some, this might not make a difference, but for others it’s what separates comfort from misery. Thankfully, removing your insoles is super easy, and replacing them with an aftermarket model that’s specific to your foot size and shape can remedy most shoe maladies. New insoles can provide more or less volume to fill out the shoe, improve the fit under the arch, and increase or decrease the cushion and impact shock. We recommend checking out Superfeet insoles for their wide selection of options and trusted reputation in daily shoes, ski boots, and hiking footwear.

Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots

Perhaps the biggest point of differentiation between hiking shoes and boots is height: Shoes have a low-top fit, while boots generally sit above the ankle. Hiking shoes excel on smooth trails where rolled ankles are less of a possibility, if you keep your pack weight down, and for those who want to move fast with less on their feet. Tradition tells us that hiking boots are the better choice for heavy packs and rough trails, and in most cases that holds true today. The tall height, along with laces that hold the shoe snugly around your ankle, offer a more secure fit, greater stability, and more protection. Given the choice, we most often select a hiking shoe for their light feel, but both are viable options for day hiking, backpacking, and non-alpine peak bagging.

In 2024 and beyond, we see the lines between hiking shoe and boot categories continuing to blur. They still will be separated by height—although some modern boots only cover part of the ankle—but fewer and fewer boots resemble the heavyweight leather clunkers of old. One example is the over-the-ankle version of our top-rated Salomon X Ultra 4. It’s the exact same shoe with the same defining characteristics—feathery feel, aggressive stance, and supportive fit—but the “Mid” sits slightly higher on the ankle, weighs a couple more ounces, provides a little more protection, and perhaps a modest increase in rollover prevention. Since most folks stick to defined trails, the push for this type of light and fast footwear will continue to take over the market.
Back to Our Top Hiking Shoe Picks Back to Our Hiking Shoe Comparison Table